Ethical Dilemma On Accepting An Offer

PART A The Case tush is a two year Graduate Engineering Trainee in an Automobile bon ton in India, on a contract binding him to work for 3 more years after the cultivation period. On completion of his preparation, bathroom gets admission for a PG Program in Management in a reputed Institute. Because of the good impression he had created during training class, the Company grants him special reserve with pay for this teaching. Further CEO personally informs him that his two year nurture expenses forget besides be aimn by the troupe. He also expresses his hopes to have him ski binding for a long tenure with the make-up.During the last semester of his program, a Multinational Organization in Automobile business offers thaumaturgy a job in their Indian operations, with 6 months intensive job training in Germany. The compensation offered was almost 10 times of what he would be getting in his present employment. . The sensitive organization would also remediate him for what ever he should pay to the present employer for returning his leave pay, education expenses or liquidated alter as per his original contract. Should John take up the decision of joining the new company?PART B John should not leave his present company. All employment is a heavy bondage, no doubt. But, the relationship of employer employee goes beyond that. The employer places full cartel on the employee for a conscientious work performance. ( Heathfield, S. M, 13-04-2009) The employee delivers goods to the best of his abilities. What he is not able to do because of his deficiency in skill, knowledge or even place is acceptable, just now knowingly withholding performance of a known skill, or cause a deliberate negligence of duty is not pardonable.Legal enforcement al focal points has limitations. approximately of the things go by moral bindings in life. Whether it is a family life or work life the element of trust forms the basic ethics of living. John should not let his present employer down. The present employer had g superstar out of the way to help John in fulfilling his ambition of completing a PG program in Management. In fact, it is this program opportunity had led the way for the new offer from another company. The present employer had not granted him the privileges with a enate attitude.The CEO had specifically called him, offered him the help and expressed his wish that John returns to the company job with added knowledge for a long tenure. John paying stomach the salaries he had earned during the special leave period or large back the expenses which the organization had taken for his education, or for that matter sincerely remitting the liquidated damages as per earlier contract, will all belittle the basic entertain of human gratitude and acknowledgement. (Hunsinger, D. v. D. , 1995, p. 65) The present employer may not be able to fulfil him for more than what they had expended on John.Their feeling of hurt with this incident, and based on that, their attitude towards employee motivation programs will all shrink, affecting the future incumbents to the organization. So, John should not leave the employment and reject the Offer given to him by the transnational company, with ten fold compensation figures. PART C John should take up the new offer All employment is a legitimate arrangement. The employer selects the right candidate, pays him a fair compensation and the employee discharges his performance with his utmost religious belief on his ability.The employee shall not cheat the employer in any of his work connect activities. He should be faithful to his employer and work for him with total commitment. He should trust his employer and feel at liberty to ask him to give whatever he thinks right on his part to ask. He should never hesitate to remind him of a privilege or condition that the employer forgets to extend. Likewise, he shall not expect for something which is not due to him. He can always get things nice wherever he has doubts about his rights. (Assertive Communication, 13-04-2009)Beyond this relationship, no employer has right to expect an employee to pass off in employment for ever. Mostly conflict of interest arises only when one accepts another employment while at working with one organization disturbing his independence in working with the original organization. (Faculty Guide, 13-04-2009) Johns opportunity is a very rare occurrence. He can not dream of such an offer in the future. He should take it up. cock-a-hoop up an opportunity, which will benefit him and his familys prosperity because of increased income will be wrong.,For that matter he might be depriving the benefits to society by not contributing his competence in a wider area of work. sometimes we confuse morals with ethics. Morals are stated to be selfish too, elsewhere (BrainMeta. Com, 13-042009) All John is expected to do is to go back to his present employer, explain the CEO the situation and his wish to go for the more prosperous job. He should be transparent enough to express his predicament. His winning up the new job is by all means for a large packet of compensation.It also gives him the opportunity in another rustic with more scope to improve his competence. From what has been his case all along, he is a person thriving for knowledge and this offer carries with it a good training program. He can always be grateful to his present employer on many future occasions, without damage to any of his personal or societal values. For instance, there may be scope for him to be a touching to the new employer for the present employer to enter into collaboration arrangements or business arrangements.