Business case for HRIS

Business case for HRISBusiness Case for HRISKey strategical areas in Insurance sector are employee retention, compensation and reward policy. computer storage can be linked directly to talent management and tuition development. Value added benefit derived from the HRIS can surely revitalise the organisation. The recent ceding back has furthered the need of lean highly efficient organisations to stem the tide against the recession. The HRIS offers benefits to employees, production line as advantageously as the HR department.Benefit for the employees.The HRIS allows immediate regain to the employees with whole lot of HR information ie Personal particulars, disciplinal procedure information, availability of all relevant forms, compensation information, benefit information, egress coordination, managing Tax information and instructions slightly training and policies. Hence the employee has no longer the need to either go to the HR department or speak to them over the phone. Fu rther more it gives transparency to the functioning of the HR department, which has been the sore point in the employee-HR department relationship.Benefit for the Business. The HRIS impact on the business is far r severallying. It not only reduces the administrative cost by reducing the administrative layers but paves a way for Re-engineering. HRIS also brings ab break through enhancement in executive decision making, employee training, better interdepartmental integration and better reporting structure. Thus HRIS helps toward reaching the organisational vision by integration, violence development, knowledge management and HR analysis. (Mayfield and Lunce, 2003) Further more heavy decisions such as freezing salaries, eliminating overtime, reducing workforce and reducing benefit contributions and tautology can be handled easily and in a correct musical mode by HRIS. It provides them with all the information required and also gives them the advantage of structuring the employer entropy as per their requirement. HRIS also helps managers to evaluate Key parameter Indicators, which are difficult to measure activities, by generation of data in graphs and charts.. Similarly recruitment system help in maintaining talent pool, which helps the organisation reduce costs by removing the recruitment agencies.Benefits for the HR departmentThe major part of each HR professional daily responsibilities is spent at administrative and informative role than on the core functionality. Hence HRIS generates time availability to be devoted to the strategic decision making. Furthermore, it aids the department by change magnitude data accuracy, higher processing speed, better productivity and ability to wee more needful and sophisticated results. (Ceriello and Freeman 1998)Issues in carrying out of HRISPre- capital punishment full stop The basic issue is naming of various HR functions for inclusion in the system. A detailed work flow analysis is required on the cost effec tiveness of all available systems and based upon it a careful customisation suite should be identified which should be in lines with the organisations HR process.(Walker,1993) For this a evaluation team consisting of members from HR, IT , Finance and purchasing department should be formed.(Wisner and Wisner, 1994).Implementation stage After the selection of the HRIS, next priority should be identification of infrastructure requirements, Inter- department adroitness for incorporation of the system with the organisational needs, formulation of term and policies for the implementation and identification of the training requirements and testing of the system. A proper cat management practises are required to ease out the issues. Training along with the awareness of the benefits of the system should be used as a convey for breaking the inertia of existing employee. (Elliot,1999). This stage is for consolidation and all attempts should be aimed at proving and testing the system, prior to it going live.Post implementation. The major romp of this stage is measuring the performance of the system and reorganising the responsibilities of the HR department. Issue in this stage can arise out of adaptive as well as corrective maintenance requirements which can be due to the misapprehension of directives or due to system limitation. (Ceriello and Freeman, 1998). Issues can also arise out of need for redefining responsibilities of HR managers. (Hagood and Friedman, 2002). Thus in order to reduce the issues in this stage pre-emptive actions need to be taken right at the set out about defining HR processes and methodical training during the consolidation phase. productive Implementation. As HRIS brings about critical changes, hence there would be areas which would escape the change (The Interia). Thus the key factor in the success of HRIS implementation is a firm commitment from the Top management,-the sponsors of the project, for providing adequate funding as well as c atering to staffing needs of the project. The top brass should promote in formation of a proper focus commission, comprising of all members crosswise the organisation, who can ensure that their line managers have the necessary directives and responsibilities for making the HRIS operational. This committee should resolve major issues and take timely course corrective actions. The steering committee needs to ensure that managers are conversant with the likely changes and make their support towards this change. This will help set an example and parameter for each members department and will also prepare the ground for dealing with change-management issues. quotationhttp//findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3495/is_n12_v41/ai_19099649/pg_4/?tag=contentcol1http//www.esocialsciences.com/data/articles/Document1206200781.437014E-02.pdfhttp//www.wkforce.com/human-resources/hris.html