Jeffersonian Republicans vs. Federalists

In regards to the unify States geological formation, Jeffersonian Republicans produce been know as unyielding structureists who had a narrow interpretation of the arrange custodyt spare- cartridge holder activity it to an extreme force out. This was in opposition to the Federalists who had oft followed a loose construction constitution. And to a certain extent, the characterization of both(prenominal) of these parties was for the more or less part accurate during the presidencies of both doubting Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. Though these parties stay delightful true to popular tones, with Jeffersonian Republicans cosmos strict and Federalists being loose, at conviction this was proven to be in accompaniment false.Thomas Jefferson and the Jeffersonian Republicans had become widely known as a strict constructionists so far prior to the election of Jefferson. This is shown in a garner that Jefferson wrote to his colleague, and future cabinet process Gideon Gra nger which shows his true support for mightiness to the secernates (Doc A. ) The letter states his hard feelings against the power that the national official government held because he was fearful that if the federal government gained too some(prenominal) power and the states had too little power, then we would intimately be creating a monarchy in the United States like Great Britain had done.A nonher prime eccentric of his ideas of harder state governments were express in his letter to Samuel Miller in 1808 (Doc B. ) Jefferson firmly commitd that he had no business in involving himself with phantasmal activities as president as the writing had made no mention of much(prenominal) activities and on that pointfore followed his strict construction linguistic rule by delegating those powers to the states. However, though Jefferson was a man who was mostly stuck to his principles of strict construction, there were very much times were he would devastate his beliefs for w hat he believed was better for the nation.A prime warning of such(prenominal) was during the Louisiana Purchase. Jefferson had to make the net c every last(predicate) on whether or non to take this giant mass of record and double the size of the United States, though he faced one study problem. Nowhere in the constitution did it state that Jefferson could solely purchase land for the boorish without consent, which labored him loosely interpret the constitution and use the elastic clause because this was believed to be incumbent and proper for the nation.During Madisons presidency, he withal was able to stay on to his principles of Jeffersonian Republicanism to a certain extent. In 1817, James Madison had addressed carnal knowledge following his vetoing of an Internal Improvements Bill due(p) to his run acrosss of strict construction (Doc H. ) He believed that though this snout would in whatever consider help the country, the president was not tending(p) direct cons ent by the constitution to create roads and canals and control commerce.His belief in strict construction had forced him to make the ultimate decision of vetoing the bill. Henceforth, though Jefferson and Madison did mostly follow intimately to the beliefs that Jeffersonian Republican company were founded on, they did not fully carry them out with some actions not corresponding to the initial ideals. The Jeffersonian Republican party was not the unaccompanied party that had to wiggle their way roughly their initial ideas as the Federalist party was similarly partially facing difficulties at times.In 1814, when copulation was discussing a conscription bill that would give a draft of all men into the army, Daniel Webster (federalist) had violated his loose construction policy in an effort to fight this bill (Doc D. ) Webster had argued that nowhere in the constitution was it stated that a draft could be created and if such a law was passed, telling would also become the power to create a dictator as well.Though he did believe in the idea that all Americans followed that went against a dictatorship, he abandoned his federalist ideas of loose construction in order to avoid a draft, even though it may have been necessary and proper. Federalists were also having troubles in their party when they publically made their troubles trig during the Hartford prescript in 1815 (Doc E. ) Federalists had to the highest degree clearly trashed their party ideas and sided with the Jeffersonian Republicans when in many of their remarks they had called for a weak rudimentary government.For example, when the Embargo Act was destroying the American economy, the Federalists valued to take away power from Congress by creating an amendment which would take away all embargos and any trade with any outside country without a two-thirds majority of both houses. Usually they would be against this as they believed in a strong central government, only if they completely contradi cted themselves at the Hartford Convention making no progress and ultimately the downfall of the Federalist party.Therefore, the Federalists had an extremely hard time staying true to their own ideals. The Federalists and Jeffersonian Republicans had developed a polar opposite view of the constitution and government. One had devoted their views to strong state government and the other to strong central government. Jeffersonian Republicans (led by Jefferson and Madison), though wanting to stick to their ideas, faced much adversity when wanting to remain strict constructionists.Yet fortunately for them they proved the characterization of their party to be for the most part accurate. The Federalists did face much more problems as they would often contradict themselves and abandon their policies of loose constructions as shown during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison. It is almost impossible to follow a partys principles to an extreme extent, as seen by both parties, so it is necessary for both to adjust to find a balance that would ultimately benefit the mountain of the nation.